SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL VARIATIONS IN PHYTOPLANKTON ASSEMBLAGES IN SOUTHAMPTON WATER ESTUARY (SOUTHERN UK) ESTIMATED FROM MICROSCOPIC COUNTS AND HPLC PIGMENT CHEMOTAXONOMY

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Biological and Geological sciences, Faculty of Education (El-Arish), Suez Canal University, Egypt.

2 School of Ocean and Earth Sciences, University of Southampton, National Oceanography Centre, Southampton UK.

3 Department of Plant Biology and Ecology, University of the Basque Country in Bilbao, Spain

Abstract

Phytoplankton biomass and community structure in Southampton Water estuary (on the south coast of the UK) have been investigated. Inter-annual changes in chlorophyll a coupled with changes in total carbon biomass have been analysed in 2004 and 2005 (during the productive period of the estuary). HPLC method has been also used to measure chlorophyll a and other accessory pigments that help, as quantitative biomarkers, to provide information on changing phytoplankton dynamics in such a highly dynamic estuary. Microscopy and chemotaxonomy give a high level of agreement phytoplankton characterization along the estuary; however, some limitations are present in both techniques. HPLC derived chlorophyll a showed a good correlation with the total phytoplankton biomass during the sampling period although it was underestimated in some samples.Fucoxanthin showed a strong correlation with total diatom biomass however high chlorophyll a concentrations during bloom time affected this relationship. Similar finding was obtained for peridinin and Dinoflagellates. Although, Cryptomonas sp. was recorded in some samples, no correlation was detected between its biomass and alloxanthin concentration due to microscopic confusion with small flagellates that were numerically abundant at the same time. Peaks in alloxanthin were, however, coincided with peaks in the biomass of the autotrophic ciliate Mesodinium rubrum. By relating the biomass of specific phytoplankton groups to their corresponding biomarker pigment, the dominance of diatoms (fucoxanthin and chlorophyll c1+c2) in spring and dinoflagellates (peridinin) in summer was established. Dinoflagellates as well as ciliates were found to grow better in the intermediate sites along the estuary. Combining the pigments together to give diagnostic indices shows a very similar pattern to that of Chl a as well as carbon biomass microscopically detected. Diagnostic pigment indices (represented as microplankton, picoplankton and nanoplankton) confirmed the previous finding that phytoplankton species succession in Southampton Water started with diatoms and followed by flagellates/ciliates and then dinoflagellates.

Ali, E. M. (2009). “Phytoplankton blooms in macrotidal estuaries’:VDM, Verlag,, Schaltungdienst Lange O. H. G. Berlin, 238 Dr. Muller, Schaltungdienst Lange O. H. G. Berlin, 238.
Ali, E. M. (2003). Processes and conditions influencing phytoplankton growth and bloom initiation”. Ph D. thesis, NOC, University of Southampton, UK.
Ali, E. M.; Purdie, D. A. and Holley, S. E. (2000). Investigations of optimal conditions for phytoplankton growth in a macrotidal estuary: Application of continuous monitoring and discrete water sampling methods, Proceedings (Vol. 1) of the UK Marine science, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Ansotegui, A., Trigueros, J. M., Orive, E. (2001). The use of pigment signatures to assess phytoplankton assemblage structure in estuarine waters. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Sci., 52: 689-703.
 
Barlow, R.G.; Mantoura, R.F.C.; Gough, M. A. and Fileman, T.A. (1993). Pigment signatures of the phytoplankton composition in the northeastern Atlantic during the 1990 spring bloom. Deep-Sea Res., II 40: 459-477.
Booth, B.C.; Lewin, J. and Postel, J.R. (1993). Temporal variation in the structure of autotrophic and hetrotrophic communities in the subarctic Pacific. Progress in Oceanography, 32:57-99.
Breton, E.; Brunet, C.; Sautour, B. and Brylinski, J. M. (2000). Annual variations of phytoplankton biomass in the eastern English Channel: comparison by pigment signatures and microscopic counts. J. Plank. Res., 22: 1423-1440.
Claustre, H.; Hooker, B.S.; Van Heukelem, L.; Berthon, J.F.; Barlow, R.; Ras, J.; Sessions, H.; Targa, C.; Thomas, C.S.; van der Linde, D. and Marty, J.C. (2004). An inter comparison of HPLC phytoplankton pigment methods using in situ samples: application to remote sensing and database activities. Marine Chemistry, 85: 41-61.
Cloern, J. E. (1996). Phytoplankton blooms dynamics in coastal ecosystem: A review with some some general lessons from a sustained investigation of San Francisco Bab, California. Reviews of Geophysics, 34: 127-168.
Crawford, D. and Purdie, D. A. (1993). Evidence for avoidence of flushing from an estuary by planktonic phototrophic ciliate. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.,79: 259-265.
Delizo, L.; Smith, W. O. and Hall, J. (2007). Taxonomic composition and growth rates of phytoplankton assemblages at the Subtropical Convergence east of New Zealand. Journal of Plankton Research, 29:655-670.
DiTullio, G.R.; Geesey, M.E.; Jones, D.R.; Daly, K.L.; Campbell, L. and Smith Jr., W.O. (2003). Phytoplankton assemblage structure and primary productivity along 170o W in the South Pacific Ocean. Mar. Eco. Prog. Series, 255:55-80.
Ediger, D.; Soydemir, N. and Kideys, A.E.(2006). Estimation of phytoplankton biomass using HPLC pigment analysis in the southwestern Black Sea. Deep Sea Res. Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography,53:1911-1922.
Eppley, R. W.; Reid, F.M.H. and Strickland, J.D.H (1970). Ecology of the plankton of La Jolla, California, in the period April through September 1967. Bull. Scripps. Inst. Oceanogr., 17: 33-42.

Fujiki,T.; Matsumoto, K.; Honda, M. C.; Kawakami, H. and Watanabe, S.  (2009). Phytoplankton composition in the sub arctic North Pacific during autumn 2005. Journal of Plankton Research, 31:179-191.

Gieskes, W. W. C. and Kraay, G. W. (1983). Dominance of Cryptophyceae during the phytoplankton spring bloom in the central North Sea detected by HPLC analysis of Pigments. Mar. Biol., 75: 179-185.
Hibberd, D. J. (1977). Observations on the ultrastructure on the cryptomonad endosymbiont of the red-water ciliate Mesodinium rubrum. J. of the Mar. Biol. Ass. UK, 57: 45-61.
Holley, S. E.and Hydes, D. J. (2002). Ferry-Boxes and data stations for improved monitoring and resolution of eutrophication-related processes: application in Southampton Water UK, a temperate latitude hupernutrified estuary. Hydrobiologia, 475/476: 99-110.
Holligan, P. M.; Harris, R.P.; Newell, R.C.; Harbour, D.S.; Head, R.N.; Lidley, E.A.S.; Lucas, M.I.; Tranter, P.R.G and Weekly, C.M. (1984). Vertical distribution and partitioning of organic carbon in mixed, frontal and stratified waters of the English Channel. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 14: 111-127.
Iriarte, A. and Purdie, D.A. (2004). Factors controlling the timing of major spring bloom events in an UK south coast estuary. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 61: 679-690.
Jeffrey, S. W. and Vesk, M. (1997). Introduction to marine phytoplankton and their pigment signature. in: Jeffrey, S. W., Mantoura, R.F.C., Wright, S.W. (Eds), Phytoplankton pigments in oceanography: Guidelines to modern methods. UNESCO, Paris. p 19-36.
Jeffery, S. W. and Wright, S. W. (1994). Photosynthetic pigments in the Haptophyta. In Green, J.C. and Leadbeater, D.S.C. (eds). Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Jeffrey, S. W.; Llewellyn, C. A.; Barlow, R.G. and Mantoura, R.F.C. (1997). Pigment processes in the sea: a selected bibliography. Phytoplankton Pigments in Oceanography: A Guide to Advanced Methods. S. W. Jeffery, Mantoura, R.F.C. and Wright, S.W. (eds). Paris, SCOR-UNESCO: 167-178.
Jeffrey, S. W.; Wright, S.W. and Zapata, M. (1999). Recent advances in HPLC analysis of phytoplankton. Mar. Res., 50: 879-896.
Kifle, D. P. and Purdie, D. A. (1993). The seasonal abundance of the phototrophic ciliate Mesodinium rubrum in Southampton Water, England. Journal of Plankton Research, 15: 823-833.
Kovala, P. E. and Larrance, J.D. (1966). Comparison of phytoplankton cell numbers, cell volume, cell surface and plasma volume, per metre, from microscopic counts. Univ. Washington Spec. Rep., 36: 1-21.
Llewellyn, C.A.; Fishwick, J.R. and Blackford, J.C. (2005). Phytoplankton community assemblages in the English Channel: a comparison using chlorophyll a derived from HPLC-CHEMTAX and carbon derived from microscopy cell counts.  Journal of Plankton Research, 27: 103-119.
Llewellyn, C. A.; Tarran, G. A. ; Galliene, C. P.; Cummings, D. G.; De Menezes, A. and Rees, A. (2008). Microbial dynamics during the decline of a spring diatom bloom in the Northeast Atlantic. Journal of Plankton Research, 30:261-273.
Mantoura, R. F. C. and Llewellyn, C.A. (1983). The rapid determination of algal chlorophyll orophyll-a and carotenoid pigments and their breakdown products in a natural water by reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography. Anal. Chim. Acta., 151: 297-314.
Menden-Deuer, S. and Lessard, E.J. (2000). Carbon to volume relationships for dinoflagellats, diatoms and other protisit plankton. Limnol. Oceanogr., 45: 569-579.
Millie, D. F.; Paerl, H. W. and Hurley, P. (1993). Microalgal pigment assessments using high performance  liquid chromatography: A synopsis of organismal and ecological applications. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 50: 2513-2527.
Parsons, T. R.; Maita, Y. and Lalli, C.M. (1984). A Manual of Chemical and Biological Methods for Sea Water Analysis. Pergamon, Oxford, 173.
Phillips, A. J. (1980). Distribution of chemical species. The Solent Estuarine System. An assessment of present knowledge, the natural environmental. Research Council Publication, 22: 44-61.
Ras, J.; Claustre,H. and UitzJ. (2008). Spatial variability of phytoplankton pigment distributions in the Subtropical South Pacific Ocean: comparison between in situ and predicted data. Biogeosciences, 5: 353-369.
Reid, F.M.H. (1983). Biomass estimation of components of the marine nanoplankton and picoplankton by the Utermohl setting technique. J. Plankton Res., 5: 235-252.
Rodriguez, F.; Varela,M. and Zapata, M. (2002). Phytoplankton assemblages in the Gerlache and Bransfield Straits (Antarctic Peninsula) determined by light microscopy and CHEMTAX analysis of HPLC pigment data. Deep-Sea Research Part Ii-Topical Studies in Oceanography, 49: 723-747.
Schluter, L.; Mohlenberg, F.; Havskum, H. and Larsen, S. (2000). The use of phytoplankton pigments for identifying and quantifying phytoplankton groups in coastal areas: Testing the influence of light and nutrients on pigment/Chlorophyll a ratios. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 192: 49-63.
Sylaios, G. and Boxall, S.R. (1998). Residual currents and flux estimates in a partially-mixed estuary. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Sci., 46: 671 - 682.
Tomas, C. R. (1997). Identifying Marine Phytoplankton. California, USA, Academic press.
Trees, C. C.; Clark, D. K.; Bidigare, R.R.; Ondrusek M. E. and Mueller J. L. (2000). Accessory pigments versus chlorophyll a concentrations within the euphotic zone: A ubiquitous relationship. Limnol. Oceanogr., 45: 1130-1143.
Wong, C. S. and Crawford, D.W. (2006). Evaluation of phytoplankton pigments in an in-situ iron enrichment experiment in the subarctic NE Pacific, Deep-Sea Research II, 10:1016.